Step3 VL 10B vs LFM2 1.2B: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Step3 VL 10B vs LFM2 1.2B Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Step3 VL 10B emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, LFM2 1.2B remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Step3 VL 10B vs LFM2 1.2B comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Step3 VL 10B

Other

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 2
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.015
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: —

LFM2 1.2B

Other

Reasoning: 1
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 1
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.015
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: —

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Step3 VL 10B vs LFM2 1.2B matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Step3 VL 10B vs LFM2 1.2B analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Step3 VL 10B` vs `LFM2 1.2B`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Step3 VL 10B vs LFM2 1.2B debate, Step3 VL 10B scores 60 against LFM2 1.2B's 10. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Step3 VL 10B vs LFM2 1.2B comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Step3 VL 10B vs LFM2 1.2B decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Step3 VL 10B300ms

LFM2 1.2B300ms

Tokens per Second

Step3 VL 10B29

LFM2 1.2B55

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Step3 VL 10B vs LFM2 1.2B

Power is only one part of the equation. This Step3 VL 10B vs LFM2 1.2B pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Step3 VL 10B would cost $0.018, whereas LFM2 1.2B would cost $0.018. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Step3 VL 10B vs LFM2 1.2B choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Step3 VL 10B vs LFM2 1.2B Battle for You?

Choose Step3 VL 10B if...

You are working in a technical or scientific field requiring the highest accuracy.

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Your use case demands cutting-edge AI performance.

Choose LFM2 1.2B if...

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

You prioritize cost-effectiveness over maximum performance.

Your workload requires consistent, reliable performance.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Step3 VL 10B vs LFM2 1.2B Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/