Claude 3.5 Haiku vs DBRX Instruct: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Claude 3.5 Haiku vs DBRX Instruct Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, DBRX Instruct emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Claude 3.5 Haiku remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Claude 3.5 Haiku vs DBRX Instruct comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Anthropic

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 2
Long Context: 2
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.002
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 48.307tokens/sec

DBRX Instruct

Other

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 6
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 1
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.015
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: —

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Claude 3.5 Haiku vs DBRX Instruct matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Claude 3.5 Haiku vs DBRX Instruct analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Claude 3.5 Haiku` vs `DBRX Instruct`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Claude 3.5 Haiku vs DBRX Instruct debate, Claude 3.5 Haiku scores 60 against DBRX Instruct's 60. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Claude 3.5 Haiku vs DBRX Instruct comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Claude 3.5 Haiku vs DBRX Instruct decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Claude 3.5 Haiku300ms

DBRX Instruct300ms

Tokens per Second

Claude 3.5 Haiku48.307

DBRX Instruct49

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Claude 3.5 Haiku vs DBRX Instruct

Power is only one part of the equation. This Claude 3.5 Haiku vs DBRX Instruct pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Claude 3.5 Haiku would cost $0.002, whereas DBRX Instruct would cost $0.018. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Claude 3.5 Haiku vs DBRX Instruct choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy