Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) vs MiniMax-M2: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) vs MiniMax-M2 Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, MiniMax-M2 emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) vs MiniMax-M2 comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning)

Anthropic

Reasoning: 8
Coding: 3
Multimodal: 3
Long Context: 5
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.002
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 103.774tokens/sec

MiniMax-M2

Other

Reasoning: 8
Coding: 3
Multimodal: 3
Long Context: 5
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.001
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 95.136tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) vs MiniMax-M2 matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) vs MiniMax-M2 analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning)` vs `MiniMax-M2`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) vs MiniMax-M2 debate, Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) scores 80 against MiniMax-M2's 80. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) vs MiniMax-M2 comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) vs MiniMax-M2 decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning)300ms

MiniMax-M2300ms

Tokens per Second

Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning)103.774

MiniMax-M295.136

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) vs MiniMax-M2

Power is only one part of the equation. This Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) vs MiniMax-M2 pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) would cost $0.002, whereas MiniMax-M2 would cost $0.001. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) vs MiniMax-M2 choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) vs MiniMax-M2 Battle for You?

Choose Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) if...

Your top priority is raw performance and capability.

Cost is a secondary concern to power in your Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) vs MiniMax-M2 decision.

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Choose MiniMax-M2 if...

You need a highly responsive model for user-facing applications.

Your budget is a primary consideration in the Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) vs MiniMax-M2 choice.

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) vs MiniMax-M2 Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/