Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 Instruct: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning)
Anthropic
Reasoning
9
Coding
5
Multimodal
4
Long Context
6
Blended Price / 1M tokens
$0.010
P95 Latency
1000ms
Tokens per second
79.024tokens/sec
Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 Instruct
Other
Reasoning
7
Coding
1
Multimodal
1
Long Context
2
Blended Price / 1M tokens
$0.000
P95 Latency
1000ms
Tokens per second
58.089tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 Instruct matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 Instruct analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning)` vs `Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 Instruct`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 Instruct debate, Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) scores 90 against Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 Instruct's 70. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 Instruct comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 Instruct decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token
Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning)300ms
Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 Instruct300ms
Tokens per Second
Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning)79.024
Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 Instruct58.089

The Economics of Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 Instruct

Power is only one part of the equation. This Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 Instruct pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown
Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Which Model Wins the Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 Instruct Battle for You?

Choose Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) if...
Your top priority is raw performance and capability.
You are working in a technical or scientific field requiring the highest accuracy.
Cost is a secondary concern to power in your Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 Instruct decision.
Choose Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 Instruct if...
You need a highly responsive model for user-facing applications.
Your budget is a primary consideration in the Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 Instruct choice.
You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

Your Questions about the Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 Instruct Comparison