DeepSeek-OCR vs Granite 4.0 H 1B: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the DeepSeek-OCR vs Granite 4.0 H 1B Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, DeepSeek-OCR emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Granite 4.0 H 1B remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed DeepSeek-OCR vs Granite 4.0 H 1B comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

DeepSeek-OCR

DeepSeek

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 6
Multimodal: 5
Long Context: 8
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.000
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 310.675tokens/sec

Granite 4.0 H 1B

Other

Reasoning: 1
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 1
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.015
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: —

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the DeepSeek-OCR vs Granite 4.0 H 1B matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our DeepSeek-OCR vs Granite 4.0 H 1B analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `DeepSeek-OCR` vs `Granite 4.0 H 1B`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the DeepSeek-OCR vs Granite 4.0 H 1B debate, DeepSeek-OCR scores 60 against Granite 4.0 H 1B's 10. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious DeepSeek-OCR vs Granite 4.0 H 1B comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the DeepSeek-OCR vs Granite 4.0 H 1B decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

DeepSeek-OCR300ms

Granite 4.0 H 1B300ms

Tokens per Second

DeepSeek-OCR310.675

Granite 4.0 H 1B51

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of DeepSeek-OCR vs Granite 4.0 H 1B

Power is only one part of the equation. This DeepSeek-OCR vs Granite 4.0 H 1B pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, DeepSeek-OCR would cost $0.000, whereas Granite 4.0 H 1B would cost $0.018. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the DeepSeek-OCR vs Granite 4.0 H 1B choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the DeepSeek-OCR vs Granite 4.0 H 1B Battle for You?

Choose DeepSeek-OCR if...

You are working in a technical or scientific field requiring the highest accuracy.

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Your use case demands cutting-edge AI performance.

Choose Granite 4.0 H 1B if...

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

You prioritize cost-effectiveness over maximum performance.

Your workload requires consistent, reliable performance.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the DeepSeek-OCR vs Granite 4.0 H 1B Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/