DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) vs Magistral Small 1: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) vs Magistral Small 1 Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Magistral Small 1 remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) vs Magistral Small 1 comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25)

DeepSeek

Reasoning: 8
Coding: 2
Multimodal: 2
Long Context: 3
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.002
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: —

Magistral Small 1

Mistral

Reasoning: 4
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 2
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.001
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 70.065tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) vs Magistral Small 1 matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) vs Magistral Small 1 analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25)` vs `Magistral Small 1`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) vs Magistral Small 1 debate, DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) scores 80 against Magistral Small 1's 40. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) vs Magistral Small 1 comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) vs Magistral Small 1 decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25)300ms

Magistral Small 1300ms

Tokens per Second

DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25)25

Magistral Small 170.065

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) vs Magistral Small 1

Power is only one part of the equation. This DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) vs Magistral Small 1 pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) would cost $0.002, whereas Magistral Small 1 would cost $0.001. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) vs Magistral Small 1 choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) vs Magistral Small 1 Battle for You?

Choose DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) if...

Your top priority is raw performance and capability.

You are working in a technical or scientific field requiring the highest accuracy.

Cost is a secondary concern to power in your DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) vs Magistral Small 1 decision.

Choose Magistral Small 1 if...

You need a highly responsive model for user-facing applications.

Your budget is a primary consideration in the DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) vs Magistral Small 1 choice.

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) vs Magistral Small 1 Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/