DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale vs Qwen3 VL 32B (Reasoning): The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale vs Qwen3 VL 32B (Reasoning) Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Qwen3 VL 32B (Reasoning) remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale vs Qwen3 VL 32B (Reasoning) comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale

DeepSeek

Reasoning: 10
Coding: 4
Multimodal: 3
Long Context: 4
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.000
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: —

Qwen3 VL 32B (Reasoning)

Other

Reasoning: 8
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 2
Long Context: 3
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.003
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 84.657tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale vs Qwen3 VL 32B (Reasoning) matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale vs Qwen3 VL 32B (Reasoning) analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale` vs `Qwen3 VL 32B (Reasoning)`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale vs Qwen3 VL 32B (Reasoning) debate, DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale scores 100 against Qwen3 VL 32B (Reasoning)'s 80. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale vs Qwen3 VL 32B (Reasoning) comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale vs Qwen3 VL 32B (Reasoning) decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale300ms

Qwen3 VL 32B (Reasoning)300ms

Tokens per Second

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale41

Qwen3 VL 32B (Reasoning)84.657

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale vs Qwen3 VL 32B (Reasoning)

Power is only one part of the equation. This DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale vs Qwen3 VL 32B (Reasoning) pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale would cost $0.001, whereas Qwen3 VL 32B (Reasoning) would cost $0.003. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale vs Qwen3 VL 32B (Reasoning) choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale vs Qwen3 VL 32B (Reasoning) Battle for You?

Choose DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale if...

Your top priority is raw performance and capability.

You are working in a technical or scientific field requiring the highest accuracy.

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Choose Qwen3 VL 32B (Reasoning) if...

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

You prioritize cost-effectiveness over maximum performance.

Your workload requires consistent, reliable performance.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale vs Qwen3 VL 32B (Reasoning) Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/