ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Jamba 1.7 Large: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Jamba 1.7 Large Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Jamba 1.7 Large remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Jamba 1.7 Large comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B

Other

Reasoning: 4
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 2
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.000
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 27.427tokens/sec

Jamba 1.7 Large

Other

Reasoning: 1
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 1
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.004
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 39.552tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Jamba 1.7 Large matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Jamba 1.7 Large analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B` vs `Jamba 1.7 Large`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Jamba 1.7 Large debate, ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B scores 40 against Jamba 1.7 Large's 10. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Jamba 1.7 Large comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Jamba 1.7 Large decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B300ms

Jamba 1.7 Large300ms

Tokens per Second

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B27.427

Jamba 1.7 Large39.552

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Jamba 1.7 Large

Power is only one part of the equation. This ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Jamba 1.7 Large pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B would cost $0.001, whereas Jamba 1.7 Large would cost $0.004. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Jamba 1.7 Large choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Jamba 1.7 Large Battle for You?

Choose ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B if...

You are working in a technical or scientific field requiring the highest accuracy.

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Your use case demands cutting-edge AI performance.

Choose Jamba 1.7 Large if...

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

You prioritize cost-effectiveness over maximum performance.

Your workload requires consistent, reliable performance.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Jamba 1.7 Large Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/