ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs OpenChat 3.5 (1210): The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs OpenChat 3.5 (1210) Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, OpenChat 3.5 (1210) emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs OpenChat 3.5 (1210) comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B

Other

Reasoning: 4
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 2
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.000
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 25.126tokens/sec

OpenChat 3.5 (1210)

Other

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 6
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 1
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.015
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: —

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs OpenChat 3.5 (1210) matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs OpenChat 3.5 (1210) analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B` vs `OpenChat 3.5 (1210)`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs OpenChat 3.5 (1210) debate, ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B scores 40 against OpenChat 3.5 (1210)'s 60. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs OpenChat 3.5 (1210) comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs OpenChat 3.5 (1210) decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B300ms

OpenChat 3.5 (1210)300ms

Tokens per Second

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B25.126

OpenChat 3.5 (1210)41

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs OpenChat 3.5 (1210)

Power is only one part of the equation. This ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs OpenChat 3.5 (1210) pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B would cost $0.001, whereas OpenChat 3.5 (1210) would cost $0.018. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs OpenChat 3.5 (1210) choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy