ERNIE 5.0 Thinking Preview vs GPT-4 Turbo: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the ERNIE 5.0 Thinking Preview vs GPT-4 Turbo Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, ERNIE 5.0 Thinking Preview emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, GPT-4 Turbo remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed ERNIE 5.0 Thinking Preview vs GPT-4 Turbo comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

ERNIE 5.0 Thinking Preview

Other

Reasoning: 9
Coding: 3
Multimodal: 2
Long Context: 4
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.001
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 24.189tokens/sec

GPT-4 Turbo

OpenAI

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 2
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 2
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.015
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 25.308tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the ERNIE 5.0 Thinking Preview vs GPT-4 Turbo matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our ERNIE 5.0 Thinking Preview vs GPT-4 Turbo analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `ERNIE 5.0 Thinking Preview` vs `GPT-4 Turbo`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the ERNIE 5.0 Thinking Preview vs GPT-4 Turbo debate, ERNIE 5.0 Thinking Preview scores 90 against GPT-4 Turbo's 60. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious ERNIE 5.0 Thinking Preview vs GPT-4 Turbo comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the ERNIE 5.0 Thinking Preview vs GPT-4 Turbo decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

ERNIE 5.0 Thinking Preview300ms

GPT-4 Turbo300ms

Tokens per Second

ERNIE 5.0 Thinking Preview24.189

GPT-4 Turbo25.308

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of ERNIE 5.0 Thinking Preview vs GPT-4 Turbo

Power is only one part of the equation. This ERNIE 5.0 Thinking Preview vs GPT-4 Turbo pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, ERNIE 5.0 Thinking Preview would cost $0.002, whereas GPT-4 Turbo would cost $0.018. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the ERNIE 5.0 Thinking Preview vs GPT-4 Turbo choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the ERNIE 5.0 Thinking Preview vs GPT-4 Turbo Battle for You?

Choose ERNIE 5.0 Thinking Preview if...

Your top priority is raw performance and capability.

You are working in a technical or scientific field requiring the highest accuracy.

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Choose GPT-4 Turbo if...

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

You prioritize cost-effectiveness over maximum performance.

Your workload requires consistent, reliable performance.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the ERNIE 5.0 Thinking Preview vs GPT-4 Turbo Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/