ERNIE 5.0 Thinking Preview vs Qwen3 4B 2507 Instruct: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the ERNIE 5.0 Thinking Preview vs Qwen3 4B 2507 Instruct Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, ERNIE 5.0 Thinking Preview emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Qwen3 4B 2507 Instruct remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed ERNIE 5.0 Thinking Preview vs Qwen3 4B 2507 Instruct comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

ERNIE 5.0 Thinking Preview

Other

Reasoning: 9
Coding: 3
Multimodal: 2
Long Context: 4
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.001
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 26.53tokens/sec

Qwen3 4B 2507 Instruct

Other

Reasoning: 5
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 2
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.015
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: —

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the ERNIE 5.0 Thinking Preview vs Qwen3 4B 2507 Instruct matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our ERNIE 5.0 Thinking Preview vs Qwen3 4B 2507 Instruct analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `ERNIE 5.0 Thinking Preview` vs `Qwen3 4B 2507 Instruct`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the ERNIE 5.0 Thinking Preview vs Qwen3 4B 2507 Instruct debate, ERNIE 5.0 Thinking Preview scores 90 against Qwen3 4B 2507 Instruct's 50. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious ERNIE 5.0 Thinking Preview vs Qwen3 4B 2507 Instruct comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the ERNIE 5.0 Thinking Preview vs Qwen3 4B 2507 Instruct decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

ERNIE 5.0 Thinking Preview300ms

Qwen3 4B 2507 Instruct300ms

Tokens per Second

ERNIE 5.0 Thinking Preview26.53

Qwen3 4B 2507 Instruct51

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of ERNIE 5.0 Thinking Preview vs Qwen3 4B 2507 Instruct

Power is only one part of the equation. This ERNIE 5.0 Thinking Preview vs Qwen3 4B 2507 Instruct pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, ERNIE 5.0 Thinking Preview would cost $0.002, whereas Qwen3 4B 2507 Instruct would cost $0.018. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the ERNIE 5.0 Thinking Preview vs Qwen3 4B 2507 Instruct choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the ERNIE 5.0 Thinking Preview vs Qwen3 4B 2507 Instruct Battle for You?

Choose ERNIE 5.0 Thinking Preview if...

Your top priority is raw performance and capability.

You are working in a technical or scientific field requiring the highest accuracy.

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Choose Qwen3 4B 2507 Instruct if...

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

You prioritize cost-effectiveness over maximum performance.

Your workload requires consistent, reliable performance.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the ERNIE 5.0 Thinking Preview vs Qwen3 4B 2507 Instruct Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/