EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs Devstral Medium: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs Devstral Medium Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Devstral Medium remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs Devstral Medium comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning)

Other

Reasoning: 8
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 2
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.001
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 95.653tokens/sec

Devstral Medium

Mistral

Reasoning: 1
Coding: 2
Multimodal: 2
Long Context: 2
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.001
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 111.232tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs Devstral Medium matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs Devstral Medium analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning)` vs `Devstral Medium`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs Devstral Medium debate, EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) scores 80 against Devstral Medium's 10. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs Devstral Medium comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs Devstral Medium decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning)300ms

Devstral Medium300ms

Tokens per Second

EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning)95.653

Devstral Medium111.232

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs Devstral Medium

Power is only one part of the equation. This EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs Devstral Medium pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) would cost $0.001, whereas Devstral Medium would cost $0.001. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs Devstral Medium choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs Devstral Medium Battle for You?

Choose EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) if...

Your top priority is raw performance and capability.

You are working in a technical or scientific field requiring the highest accuracy.

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Choose Devstral Medium if...

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

You prioritize cost-effectiveness over maximum performance.

Your workload requires consistent, reliable performance.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs Devstral Medium Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/