EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs KAT-Coder-Pro V1: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs KAT-Coder-Pro V1 Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, KAT-Coder-Pro V1 emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs KAT-Coder-Pro V1 comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning)

Other

Reasoning: 8
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 2
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.001
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 95.653tokens/sec

KAT-Coder-Pro V1

Other

Reasoning: 9
Coding: 2
Multimodal: 3
Long Context: 5
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.001
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 47.673tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs KAT-Coder-Pro V1 matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs KAT-Coder-Pro V1 analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning)` vs `KAT-Coder-Pro V1`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs KAT-Coder-Pro V1 debate, EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) scores 80 against KAT-Coder-Pro V1's 90. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs KAT-Coder-Pro V1 comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs KAT-Coder-Pro V1 decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning)300ms

KAT-Coder-Pro V1300ms

Tokens per Second

EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning)95.653

KAT-Coder-Pro V147.673

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs KAT-Coder-Pro V1

Power is only one part of the equation. This EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs KAT-Coder-Pro V1 pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) would cost $0.001, whereas KAT-Coder-Pro V1 would cost $0.001. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs KAT-Coder-Pro V1 choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs KAT-Coder-Pro V1 Battle for You?

Choose EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) if...

Your top priority is raw performance and capability.

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Your use case demands cutting-edge AI performance.

Choose KAT-Coder-Pro V1 if...

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

You prioritize cost-effectiveness over maximum performance.

Your workload requires consistent, reliable performance.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs KAT-Coder-Pro V1 Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/