Gemini 1.5 Flash (May '24) vs Pixtral Large: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Gemini 1.5 Flash (May '24) vs Pixtral Large Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Gemini 1.5 Flash (May '24) emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Pixtral Large remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Gemini 1.5 Flash (May '24) vs Pixtral Large comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Gemini 1.5 Flash (May '24)

Google

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 6
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 1
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.015
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: —

Pixtral Large

Mistral

Reasoning: 1
Coding: 6
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 2
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.003
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 51.664tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Gemini 1.5 Flash (May '24) vs Pixtral Large matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Gemini 1.5 Flash (May '24) vs Pixtral Large analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Gemini 1.5 Flash (May '24)` vs `Pixtral Large`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Gemini 1.5 Flash (May '24) vs Pixtral Large debate, Gemini 1.5 Flash (May '24) scores 60 against Pixtral Large's 10. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Gemini 1.5 Flash (May '24) vs Pixtral Large comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Gemini 1.5 Flash (May '24) vs Pixtral Large decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Gemini 1.5 Flash (May '24)300ms

Pixtral Large300ms

Tokens per Second

Gemini 1.5 Flash (May '24)66

Pixtral Large51.664

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Gemini 1.5 Flash (May '24) vs Pixtral Large

Power is only one part of the equation. This Gemini 1.5 Flash (May '24) vs Pixtral Large pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Gemini 1.5 Flash (May '24) would cost $0.018, whereas Pixtral Large would cost $0.004. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Gemini 1.5 Flash (May '24) vs Pixtral Large choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Gemini 1.5 Flash (May '24) vs Pixtral Large Battle for You?

Choose Gemini 1.5 Flash (May '24) if...

You are working in a technical or scientific field requiring the highest accuracy.

Cost is a secondary concern to power in your Gemini 1.5 Flash (May '24) vs Pixtral Large decision.

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Choose Pixtral Large if...

You need a highly responsive model for user-facing applications.

Your budget is a primary consideration in the Gemini 1.5 Flash (May '24) vs Pixtral Large choice.

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Gemini 1.5 Flash (May '24) vs Pixtral Large Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/