Gemini 1.5 Pro (May '24) vs Magistral Medium 1: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Gemini 1.5 Pro (May '24) vs Magistral Medium 1 Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Gemini 1.5 Pro (May '24) emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Magistral Medium 1 remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Gemini 1.5 Pro (May '24) vs Magistral Medium 1 comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Gemini 1.5 Pro (May '24)

Google

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 2
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 2
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.015
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: —

Magistral Medium 1

Mistral

Reasoning: 4
Coding: 2
Multimodal: 2
Long Context: 2
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.003
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 37.271tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Gemini 1.5 Pro (May '24) vs Magistral Medium 1 matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Gemini 1.5 Pro (May '24) vs Magistral Medium 1 analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Gemini 1.5 Pro (May '24)` vs `Magistral Medium 1`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Gemini 1.5 Pro (May '24) vs Magistral Medium 1 debate, Gemini 1.5 Pro (May '24) scores 60 against Magistral Medium 1's 40. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Gemini 1.5 Pro (May '24) vs Magistral Medium 1 comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Gemini 1.5 Pro (May '24) vs Magistral Medium 1 decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Gemini 1.5 Pro (May '24)300ms

Magistral Medium 1300ms

Tokens per Second

Gemini 1.5 Pro (May '24)52

Magistral Medium 137.271

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Gemini 1.5 Pro (May '24) vs Magistral Medium 1

Power is only one part of the equation. This Gemini 1.5 Pro (May '24) vs Magistral Medium 1 pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Gemini 1.5 Pro (May '24) would cost $0.018, whereas Magistral Medium 1 would cost $0.003. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Gemini 1.5 Pro (May '24) vs Magistral Medium 1 choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Gemini 1.5 Pro (May '24) vs Magistral Medium 1 Battle for You?

Choose Gemini 1.5 Pro (May '24) if...

You are working in a technical or scientific field requiring the highest accuracy.

Cost is a secondary concern to power in your Gemini 1.5 Pro (May '24) vs Magistral Medium 1 decision.

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Choose Magistral Medium 1 if...

You need a highly responsive model for user-facing applications.

Your budget is a primary consideration in the Gemini 1.5 Pro (May '24) vs Magistral Medium 1 choice.

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Gemini 1.5 Pro (May '24) vs Magistral Medium 1 Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/