Gemma 3 27B Instruct vs GPT-3.5 Turbo: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Gemma 3 27B Instruct vs GPT-3.5 Turbo Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, GPT-3.5 Turbo emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Gemma 3 27B Instruct remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Gemma 3 27B Instruct vs GPT-3.5 Turbo comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Gemma 3 27B Instruct

Google

Reasoning: 2
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 1
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.015
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 40.501tokens/sec

GPT-3.5 Turbo

OpenAI

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 1
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.001
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 100.48tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Gemma 3 27B Instruct vs GPT-3.5 Turbo matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Gemma 3 27B Instruct vs GPT-3.5 Turbo analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Gemma 3 27B Instruct` vs `GPT-3.5 Turbo`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Gemma 3 27B Instruct vs GPT-3.5 Turbo debate, Gemma 3 27B Instruct scores 20 against GPT-3.5 Turbo's 60. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Gemma 3 27B Instruct vs GPT-3.5 Turbo comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Gemma 3 27B Instruct vs GPT-3.5 Turbo decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Gemma 3 27B Instruct300ms

GPT-3.5 Turbo300ms

Tokens per Second

Gemma 3 27B Instruct40.501

GPT-3.5 Turbo100.48

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Gemma 3 27B Instruct vs GPT-3.5 Turbo

Power is only one part of the equation. This Gemma 3 27B Instruct vs GPT-3.5 Turbo pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Gemma 3 27B Instruct would cost $0.018, whereas GPT-3.5 Turbo would cost $0.001. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Gemma 3 27B Instruct vs GPT-3.5 Turbo choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Gemma 3 27B Instruct vs GPT-3.5 Turbo Battle for You?

Choose Gemma 3 27B Instruct if...

Cost is a secondary concern to power in your Gemma 3 27B Instruct vs GPT-3.5 Turbo decision.

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Your use case demands cutting-edge AI performance.

Choose GPT-3.5 Turbo if...

You need a highly responsive model for user-facing applications.

Your budget is a primary consideration in the Gemma 3 27B Instruct vs GPT-3.5 Turbo choice.

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Gemma 3 27B Instruct vs GPT-3.5 Turbo Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/