Gemma 3n E2B Instruct vs Mistral Small (Feb '24): The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Gemma 3n E2B Instruct vs Mistral Small (Feb '24) Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Mistral Small (Feb '24) emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Gemma 3n E2B Instruct remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Gemma 3n E2B Instruct vs Mistral Small (Feb '24) comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Gemma 3n E2B Instruct

Google

Reasoning: 1
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 1
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.015
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 37.738tokens/sec

Mistral Small (Feb '24)

Mistral

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 6
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 1
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.002
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 119.688tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Gemma 3n E2B Instruct vs Mistral Small (Feb '24) matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Gemma 3n E2B Instruct vs Mistral Small (Feb '24) analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Gemma 3n E2B Instruct` vs `Mistral Small (Feb '24)`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Gemma 3n E2B Instruct vs Mistral Small (Feb '24) debate, Gemma 3n E2B Instruct scores 10 against Mistral Small (Feb '24)'s 60. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Gemma 3n E2B Instruct vs Mistral Small (Feb '24) comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Gemma 3n E2B Instruct vs Mistral Small (Feb '24) decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Gemma 3n E2B Instruct300ms

Mistral Small (Feb '24)300ms

Tokens per Second

Gemma 3n E2B Instruct37.738

Mistral Small (Feb '24)119.688

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Gemma 3n E2B Instruct vs Mistral Small (Feb '24)

Power is only one part of the equation. This Gemma 3n E2B Instruct vs Mistral Small (Feb '24) pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Gemma 3n E2B Instruct would cost $0.018, whereas Mistral Small (Feb '24) would cost $0.002. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Gemma 3n E2B Instruct vs Mistral Small (Feb '24) choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Gemma 3n E2B Instruct vs Mistral Small (Feb '24) Battle for You?

Choose Gemma 3n E2B Instruct if...

Cost is a secondary concern to power in your Gemma 3n E2B Instruct vs Mistral Small (Feb '24) decision.

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Your use case demands cutting-edge AI performance.

Choose Mistral Small (Feb '24) if...

You need a highly responsive model for user-facing applications.

Your budget is a primary consideration in the Gemma 3n E2B Instruct vs Mistral Small (Feb '24) choice.

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Gemma 3n E2B Instruct vs Mistral Small (Feb '24) Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/