Gemma 3n E4B Instruct vs Granite 4.0 H Small: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Gemma 3n E4B Instruct vs Granite 4.0 H Small Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Granite 4.0 H Small emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Gemma 3n E4B Instruct remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Gemma 3n E4B Instruct vs Granite 4.0 H Small comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Gemma 3n E4B Instruct

Google

Reasoning: 1
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 1
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.000
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 36.18tokens/sec

Granite 4.0 H Small

Other

Reasoning: 1
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 1
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.000
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 336.245tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Gemma 3n E4B Instruct vs Granite 4.0 H Small matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Gemma 3n E4B Instruct vs Granite 4.0 H Small analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Gemma 3n E4B Instruct` vs `Granite 4.0 H Small`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Gemma 3n E4B Instruct vs Granite 4.0 H Small debate, Gemma 3n E4B Instruct scores 10 against Granite 4.0 H Small's 10. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Gemma 3n E4B Instruct vs Granite 4.0 H Small comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Gemma 3n E4B Instruct vs Granite 4.0 H Small decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Gemma 3n E4B Instruct300ms

Granite 4.0 H Small300ms

Tokens per Second

Gemma 3n E4B Instruct36.18

Granite 4.0 H Small336.245

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Gemma 3n E4B Instruct vs Granite 4.0 H Small

Power is only one part of the equation. This Gemma 3n E4B Instruct vs Granite 4.0 H Small pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Gemma 3n E4B Instruct would cost $0.000, whereas Granite 4.0 H Small would cost $0.000. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Gemma 3n E4B Instruct vs Granite 4.0 H Small choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Gemma 3n E4B Instruct vs Granite 4.0 H Small Battle for You?

Choose Gemma 3n E4B Instruct if...

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Your use case demands cutting-edge AI performance.

Choose Granite 4.0 H Small if...

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

You prioritize cost-effectiveness over maximum performance.

Your workload requires consistent, reliable performance.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Gemma 3n E4B Instruct vs Granite 4.0 H Small Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/