Gemma 3n E4B Instruct vs Llama 65B: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Gemma 3n E4B Instruct vs Llama 65B Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Llama 65B emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Gemma 3n E4B Instruct remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Gemma 3n E4B Instruct vs Llama 65B comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Gemma 3n E4B Instruct

Google

Reasoning: 1
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 1
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.000
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 43.032tokens/sec

Llama 65B

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Gemma 3n E4B Instruct vs Llama 65B matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Gemma 3n E4B Instruct vs Llama 65B analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Gemma 3n E4B Instruct` vs `Llama 65B`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Gemma 3n E4B Instruct vs Llama 65B debate, Gemma 3n E4B Instruct scores 10 against Llama 65B's 60. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Gemma 3n E4B Instruct vs Llama 65B comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Gemma 3n E4B Instruct vs Llama 65B decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Gemma 3n E4B Instruct300ms

Llama 65B300ms

Tokens per Second

Gemma 3n E4B Instruct43.032

Llama 65B54

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Gemma 3n E4B Instruct vs Llama 65B

Power is only one part of the equation. This Gemma 3n E4B Instruct vs Llama 65B pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Gemma 3n E4B Instruct would cost $0.000, whereas Llama 65B would cost $0.018. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Gemma 3n E4B Instruct vs Llama 65B choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy