Gemma 3n E4B Instruct vs Olmo 3.1 32B Think: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Gemma 3n E4B Instruct vs Olmo 3.1 32B Think Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Olmo 3.1 32B Think emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Gemma 3n E4B Instruct remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Gemma 3n E4B Instruct vs Olmo 3.1 32B Think comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Gemma 3n E4B Instruct

Google

Reasoning: 1
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 1
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.000
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 36.18tokens/sec

Olmo 3.1 32B Think

Other

Reasoning: 8
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 2
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.015
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 103.022tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Gemma 3n E4B Instruct vs Olmo 3.1 32B Think matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Gemma 3n E4B Instruct vs Olmo 3.1 32B Think analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Gemma 3n E4B Instruct` vs `Olmo 3.1 32B Think`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Gemma 3n E4B Instruct vs Olmo 3.1 32B Think debate, Gemma 3n E4B Instruct scores 10 against Olmo 3.1 32B Think's 80. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Gemma 3n E4B Instruct vs Olmo 3.1 32B Think comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Gemma 3n E4B Instruct vs Olmo 3.1 32B Think decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Gemma 3n E4B Instruct300ms

Olmo 3.1 32B Think300ms

Tokens per Second

Gemma 3n E4B Instruct36.18

Olmo 3.1 32B Think103.022

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Gemma 3n E4B Instruct vs Olmo 3.1 32B Think

Power is only one part of the equation. This Gemma 3n E4B Instruct vs Olmo 3.1 32B Think pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Gemma 3n E4B Instruct would cost $0.000, whereas Olmo 3.1 32B Think would cost $0.018. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Gemma 3n E4B Instruct vs Olmo 3.1 32B Think choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Gemma 3n E4B Instruct vs Olmo 3.1 32B Think Battle for You?

Choose Gemma 3n E4B Instruct if...

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Your use case demands cutting-edge AI performance.

Choose Olmo 3.1 32B Think if...

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

You prioritize cost-effectiveness over maximum performance.

Your workload requires consistent, reliable performance.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Gemma 3n E4B Instruct vs Olmo 3.1 32B Think Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/