GPT-4 Turbo vs Claude 4.1 Opus (Reasoning): The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the GPT-4 Turbo vs Claude 4.1 Opus (Reasoning) Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Claude 4.1 Opus (Reasoning) emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, GPT-4 Turbo remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed GPT-4 Turbo vs Claude 4.1 Opus (Reasoning) comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

GPT-4 Turbo

OpenAI

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 2
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 2
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.015
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 25.308tokens/sec

Claude 4.1 Opus (Reasoning)

Anthropic

Reasoning: 8
Coding: 4
Multimodal: 3
Long Context: 4
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.030
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 45.225tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the GPT-4 Turbo vs Claude 4.1 Opus (Reasoning) matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our GPT-4 Turbo vs Claude 4.1 Opus (Reasoning) analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `GPT-4 Turbo` vs `Claude 4.1 Opus (Reasoning)`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the GPT-4 Turbo vs Claude 4.1 Opus (Reasoning) debate, GPT-4 Turbo scores 60 against Claude 4.1 Opus (Reasoning)'s 80. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious GPT-4 Turbo vs Claude 4.1 Opus (Reasoning) comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the GPT-4 Turbo vs Claude 4.1 Opus (Reasoning) decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

GPT-4 Turbo300ms

Claude 4.1 Opus (Reasoning)300ms

Tokens per Second

GPT-4 Turbo25.308

Claude 4.1 Opus (Reasoning)45.225

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of GPT-4 Turbo vs Claude 4.1 Opus (Reasoning)

Power is only one part of the equation. This GPT-4 Turbo vs Claude 4.1 Opus (Reasoning) pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, GPT-4 Turbo would cost $0.018, whereas Claude 4.1 Opus (Reasoning) would cost $0.034. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the GPT-4 Turbo vs Claude 4.1 Opus (Reasoning) choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy