GPT-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning): The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the GPT-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning) Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning) emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, GPT-5.2 (Non-reasoning) remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed GPT-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning) comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

GPT-5.2 (Non-reasoning)

OpenAI

Reasoning: 5
Coding: 3
Multimodal: 3
Long Context: 4
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.005
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 76.189tokens/sec

Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)

Other

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 3
Multimodal: 3
Long Context: 5
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.001
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 104.333tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the GPT-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning) matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our GPT-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning) analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `GPT-5.2 (Non-reasoning)` vs `Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the GPT-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning) debate, GPT-5.2 (Non-reasoning) scores 50 against Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)'s 60. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious GPT-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning) comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the GPT-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning) decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

GPT-5.2 (Non-reasoning)300ms

Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)300ms

Tokens per Second

GPT-5.2 (Non-reasoning)76.189

Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)104.333

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of GPT-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)

Power is only one part of the equation. This GPT-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning) pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, GPT-5.2 (Non-reasoning) would cost $0.005, whereas Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning) would cost $0.001. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the GPT-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning) choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the GPT-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning) Battle for You?

Choose GPT-5.2 (Non-reasoning) if...

Cost is a secondary concern to power in your GPT-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning) decision.

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Your use case demands cutting-edge AI performance.

Choose Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning) if...

You need a highly responsive model for user-facing applications.

Your budget is a primary consideration in the GPT-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning) choice.

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the GPT-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning) Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/