Grok 3 mini Reasoning (high) vs Llama 65B: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Grok 3 mini Reasoning (high) vs Llama 65B Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Grok 3 mini Reasoning (high) emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Llama 65B remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Grok 3 mini Reasoning (high) vs Llama 65B comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Grok 3 mini Reasoning (high)

xAI

Reasoning: 8
Coding: 3
Multimodal: 3
Long Context: 4
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.000
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 193.839tokens/sec

Llama 65B

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Grok 3 mini Reasoning (high) vs Llama 65B matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Grok 3 mini Reasoning (high) vs Llama 65B analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Grok 3 mini Reasoning (high)` vs `Llama 65B`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Grok 3 mini Reasoning (high) vs Llama 65B debate, Grok 3 mini Reasoning (high) scores 80 against Llama 65B's 60. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Grok 3 mini Reasoning (high) vs Llama 65B comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Grok 3 mini Reasoning (high) vs Llama 65B decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Grok 3 mini Reasoning (high)300ms

Llama 65B300ms

Tokens per Second

Grok 3 mini Reasoning (high)193.839

Llama 65B54

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Grok 3 mini Reasoning (high) vs Llama 65B

Power is only one part of the equation. This Grok 3 mini Reasoning (high) vs Llama 65B pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Grok 3 mini Reasoning (high) would cost $0.000, whereas Llama 65B would cost $0.018. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Grok 3 mini Reasoning (high) vs Llama 65B choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Grok 3 mini Reasoning (high) vs Llama 65B Battle for You?

Choose Grok 3 mini Reasoning (high) if...

Your top priority is raw performance and capability.

You are working in a technical or scientific field requiring the highest accuracy.

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Choose Llama 65B if...

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

You prioritize cost-effectiveness over maximum performance.

Your workload requires consistent, reliable performance.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Grok 3 mini Reasoning (high) vs Llama 65B Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/