Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 405B (Non-reasoning) vs Llama 65B: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 405B (Non-reasoning) vs Llama 65B Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Llama 65B emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 405B (Non-reasoning) remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 405B (Non-reasoning) vs Llama 65B comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 405B (Non-reasoning)

Other

Reasoning: 2
Coding: 2
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 2
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.002
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 32.869tokens/sec

Llama 65B

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 405B (Non-reasoning) vs Llama 65B matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 405B (Non-reasoning) vs Llama 65B analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 405B (Non-reasoning)` vs `Llama 65B`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 405B (Non-reasoning) vs Llama 65B debate, Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 405B (Non-reasoning) scores 20 against Llama 65B's 60. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 405B (Non-reasoning) vs Llama 65B comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 405B (Non-reasoning) vs Llama 65B decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 405B (Non-reasoning)300ms

Llama 65B300ms

Tokens per Second

Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 405B (Non-reasoning)32.869

Llama 65B54

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 405B (Non-reasoning) vs Llama 65B

Power is only one part of the equation. This Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 405B (Non-reasoning) vs Llama 65B pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 405B (Non-reasoning) would cost $0.002, whereas Llama 65B would cost $0.018. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 405B (Non-reasoning) vs Llama 65B choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 405B (Non-reasoning) vs Llama 65B Battle for You?

Choose Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 405B (Non-reasoning) if...

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Your use case demands cutting-edge AI performance.

Choose Llama 65B if...

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

You prioritize cost-effectiveness over maximum performance.

Your workload requires consistent, reliable performance.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 405B (Non-reasoning) vs Llama 65B Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/