Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Reasoning) vs GPT-4: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Reasoning) vs GPT-4 Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Reasoning) emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, GPT-4 remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Reasoning) vs GPT-4 comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Reasoning)

Other

Reasoning: 7
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 2
Long Context: 3
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.000
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 81.354tokens/sec

GPT-4

OpenAI

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 2
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.037
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 32.098tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Reasoning) vs GPT-4 matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Reasoning) vs GPT-4 analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Reasoning)` vs `GPT-4`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Reasoning) vs GPT-4 debate, Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Reasoning) scores 70 against GPT-4's 60. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Reasoning) vs GPT-4 comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Reasoning) vs GPT-4 decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Reasoning)300ms

GPT-4300ms

Tokens per Second

Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Reasoning)81.354

GPT-432.098

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Reasoning) vs GPT-4

Power is only one part of the equation. This Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Reasoning) vs GPT-4 pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Reasoning) would cost $0.000, whereas GPT-4 would cost $0.045. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Reasoning) vs GPT-4 choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Reasoning) vs GPT-4 Battle for You?

Choose Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Reasoning) if...

You are working in a technical or scientific field requiring the highest accuracy.

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Your use case demands cutting-edge AI performance.

Choose GPT-4 if...

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

You prioritize cost-effectiveness over maximum performance.

Your workload requires consistent, reliable performance.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Reasoning) vs GPT-4 Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/