LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking vs K2-V2 (medium): The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking vs K2-V2 (medium) Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, K2-V2 (medium) emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking vs K2-V2 (medium) comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

Other

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 1
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.015
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: —

K2-V2 (medium)

Other

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 2
Long Context: 2
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.015
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: —

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking vs K2-V2 (medium) matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking vs K2-V2 (medium) analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking` vs `K2-V2 (medium)`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking vs K2-V2 (medium) debate, LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking scores 60 against K2-V2 (medium)'s 60. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking vs K2-V2 (medium) comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking vs K2-V2 (medium) decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking300ms

K2-V2 (medium)300ms

Tokens per Second

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking55

K2-V2 (medium)46

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking vs K2-V2 (medium)

Power is only one part of the equation. This LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking vs K2-V2 (medium) pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking would cost $0.018, whereas K2-V2 (medium) would cost $0.018. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking vs K2-V2 (medium) choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy