LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking vs LFM2.5-VL-1.6B: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking vs LFM2.5-VL-1.6B Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, LFM2.5-VL-1.6B emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking vs LFM2.5-VL-1.6B comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking

Other

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 1
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.015
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: —

LFM2.5-VL-1.6B

Other

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 1
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.015
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: —

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking vs LFM2.5-VL-1.6B matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking vs LFM2.5-VL-1.6B analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking` vs `LFM2.5-VL-1.6B`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking vs LFM2.5-VL-1.6B debate, LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking scores 60 against LFM2.5-VL-1.6B's 60. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking vs LFM2.5-VL-1.6B comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking vs LFM2.5-VL-1.6B decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking300ms

LFM2.5-VL-1.6B300ms

Tokens per Second

LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking55

LFM2.5-VL-1.6B46

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking vs LFM2.5-VL-1.6B

Power is only one part of the equation. This LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking vs LFM2.5-VL-1.6B pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking would cost $0.018, whereas LFM2.5-VL-1.6B would cost $0.018. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking vs LFM2.5-VL-1.6B choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy