Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B vs Phi-4 Mini Instruct: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B vs Phi-4 Mini Instruct Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Phi-4 Mini Instruct emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B vs Phi-4 Mini Instruct comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B vs Phi-4 Mini Instruct matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B vs Phi-4 Mini Instruct analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B` vs `Phi-4 Mini Instruct`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B vs Phi-4 Mini Instruct debate, Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B scores 10 against Phi-4 Mini Instruct's 10. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B vs Phi-4 Mini Instruct comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B vs Phi-4 Mini Instruct decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B300ms

Phi-4 Mini Instruct300ms

Tokens per Second

Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B110.345

Phi-4 Mini Instruct44.419

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B vs Phi-4 Mini Instruct

Power is only one part of the equation. This Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B vs Phi-4 Mini Instruct pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B would cost $0.001, whereas Phi-4 Mini Instruct would cost $0.018. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B vs Phi-4 Mini Instruct choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B vs Phi-4 Mini Instruct Battle for You?

Choose Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B if...

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Your use case demands cutting-edge AI performance.

Choose Phi-4 Mini Instruct if...

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

You prioritize cost-effectiveness over maximum performance.

Your workload requires consistent, reliable performance.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B vs Phi-4 Mini Instruct Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/