Llama 65B vs Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning): The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Llama 65B vs Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning) Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Llama 65B emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning) remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Llama 65B vs Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning) comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Llama 65B

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Llama 65B vs Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning) matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Llama 65B vs Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning) analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Llama 65B` vs `Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning)`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Llama 65B vs Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning) debate, Llama 65B scores 60 against Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning)'s 20. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Llama 65B vs Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning) comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Llama 65B vs Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning) decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Llama 65B300ms

Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning)300ms

Tokens per Second

Llama 65B54

Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning)66.468

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Llama 65B vs Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning)

Power is only one part of the equation. This Llama 65B vs Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning) pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Llama 65B would cost $0.018, whereas Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning) would cost $0.000. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Llama 65B vs Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning) choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Llama 65B vs Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning) Battle for You?

Choose Llama 65B if...

You are working in a technical or scientific field requiring the highest accuracy.

Cost is a secondary concern to power in your Llama 65B vs Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning) decision.

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Choose Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning) if...

You need a highly responsive model for user-facing applications.

Your budget is a primary consideration in the Llama 65B vs Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning) choice.

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Llama 65B vs Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning) Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/