Magistral Small 1.2 vs Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning): The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Magistral Small 1.2 vs Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Magistral Small 1.2 remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Magistral Small 1.2 vs Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Magistral Small 1.2

Mistral

Reasoning: 8
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 2
Long Context: 3
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.001
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 182.755tokens/sec

Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning)

Other

Reasoning: 7
Coding: 2
Multimodal: 5
Long Context: 8
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.001
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 73.274tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Magistral Small 1.2 vs Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Magistral Small 1.2 vs Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Magistral Small 1.2` vs `Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning)`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Magistral Small 1.2 vs Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) debate, Magistral Small 1.2 scores 80 against Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning)'s 70. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Magistral Small 1.2 vs Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Magistral Small 1.2 vs Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Magistral Small 1.2300ms

Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning)300ms

Tokens per Second

Magistral Small 1.2182.755

Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning)73.274

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Magistral Small 1.2 vs Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning)

Power is only one part of the equation. This Magistral Small 1.2 vs Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Magistral Small 1.2 would cost $0.001, whereas Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) would cost $0.002. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Magistral Small 1.2 vs Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Magistral Small 1.2 vs Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) Battle for You?

Choose Magistral Small 1.2 if...

Your top priority is raw performance and capability.

You are working in a technical or scientific field requiring the highest accuracy.

Cost is a secondary concern to power in your Magistral Small 1.2 vs Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) decision.

Choose Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) if...

You need a highly responsive model for user-facing applications.

Your budget is a primary consideration in the Magistral Small 1.2 vs Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) choice.

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Magistral Small 1.2 vs Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/