Magistral Small 1.2 vs Jamba 1.7 Mini: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Magistral Small 1.2 vs Jamba 1.7 Mini Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Magistral Small 1.2 emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Jamba 1.7 Mini remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Magistral Small 1.2 vs Jamba 1.7 Mini comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Magistral Small 1.2

Mistral

Reasoning: 8
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 2
Long Context: 3
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.001
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 91.73tokens/sec

Jamba 1.7 Mini

Other

Reasoning: 1
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 1
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.000
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: —

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Magistral Small 1.2 vs Jamba 1.7 Mini matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Magistral Small 1.2 vs Jamba 1.7 Mini analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Magistral Small 1.2` vs `Jamba 1.7 Mini`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Magistral Small 1.2 vs Jamba 1.7 Mini debate, Magistral Small 1.2 scores 80 against Jamba 1.7 Mini's 10. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Magistral Small 1.2 vs Jamba 1.7 Mini comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Magistral Small 1.2 vs Jamba 1.7 Mini decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Magistral Small 1.2300ms

Jamba 1.7 Mini300ms

Tokens per Second

Magistral Small 1.291.73

Jamba 1.7 Mini58

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Magistral Small 1.2 vs Jamba 1.7 Mini

Power is only one part of the equation. This Magistral Small 1.2 vs Jamba 1.7 Mini pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Magistral Small 1.2 would cost $0.001, whereas Jamba 1.7 Mini would cost $0.000. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Magistral Small 1.2 vs Jamba 1.7 Mini choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Magistral Small 1.2 vs Jamba 1.7 Mini Battle for You?

Choose Magistral Small 1.2 if...

Your top priority is raw performance and capability.

You are working in a technical or scientific field requiring the highest accuracy.

Cost is a secondary concern to power in your Magistral Small 1.2 vs Jamba 1.7 Mini decision.

Choose Jamba 1.7 Mini if...

You need a highly responsive model for user-facing applications.

Your budget is a primary consideration in the Magistral Small 1.2 vs Jamba 1.7 Mini choice.

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Magistral Small 1.2 vs Jamba 1.7 Mini Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/