MiMo-V2-Flash (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3 Max Thinking: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the MiMo-V2-Flash (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3 Max Thinking Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Qwen3 Max Thinking emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, MiMo-V2-Flash (Non-reasoning) remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed MiMo-V2-Flash (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3 Max Thinking comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

MiMo-V2-Flash (Non-reasoning)

Other

Reasoning: 7
Coding: 3
Multimodal: 3
Long Context: 4
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.000
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 136.258tokens/sec

Qwen3 Max Thinking

Other

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 3
Multimodal: 3
Long Context: 5
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.002
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 40.17tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the MiMo-V2-Flash (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3 Max Thinking matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our MiMo-V2-Flash (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3 Max Thinking analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `MiMo-V2-Flash (Non-reasoning)` vs `Qwen3 Max Thinking`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the MiMo-V2-Flash (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3 Max Thinking debate, MiMo-V2-Flash (Non-reasoning) scores 70 against Qwen3 Max Thinking's 60. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious MiMo-V2-Flash (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3 Max Thinking comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the MiMo-V2-Flash (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3 Max Thinking decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

MiMo-V2-Flash (Non-reasoning)300ms

Qwen3 Max Thinking300ms

Tokens per Second

MiMo-V2-Flash (Non-reasoning)136.258

Qwen3 Max Thinking40.17

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of MiMo-V2-Flash (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3 Max Thinking

Power is only one part of the equation. This MiMo-V2-Flash (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3 Max Thinking pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, MiMo-V2-Flash (Non-reasoning) would cost $0.000, whereas Qwen3 Max Thinking would cost $0.003. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the MiMo-V2-Flash (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3 Max Thinking choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the MiMo-V2-Flash (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3 Max Thinking Battle for You?

Choose MiMo-V2-Flash (Non-reasoning) if...

You are working in a technical or scientific field requiring the highest accuracy.

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Your use case demands cutting-edge AI performance.

Choose Qwen3 Max Thinking if...

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

You prioritize cost-effectiveness over maximum performance.

Your workload requires consistent, reliable performance.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the MiMo-V2-Flash (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3 Max Thinking Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/