Ministral 3 14B vs Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning): The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Ministral 3 14B vs Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning) Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning) emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Ministral 3 14B remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Ministral 3 14B vs Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning) comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Ministral 3 14B

Mistral

Reasoning: 3
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 2
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.000
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 138.644tokens/sec

Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)

Other

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 3
Multimodal: 3
Long Context: 5
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.001
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 104.763tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Ministral 3 14B vs Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning) matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Ministral 3 14B vs Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning) analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Ministral 3 14B` vs `Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Ministral 3 14B vs Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning) debate, Ministral 3 14B scores 30 against Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)'s 60. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Ministral 3 14B vs Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning) comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Ministral 3 14B vs Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning) decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Ministral 3 14B300ms

Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)300ms

Tokens per Second

Ministral 3 14B138.644

Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)104.763

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Ministral 3 14B vs Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)

Power is only one part of the equation. This Ministral 3 14B vs Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning) pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Ministral 3 14B would cost $0.000, whereas Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning) would cost $0.001. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Ministral 3 14B vs Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning) choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Ministral 3 14B vs Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning) Battle for You?

Choose Ministral 3 14B if...

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Your use case demands cutting-edge AI performance.

Choose Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning) if...

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

You prioritize cost-effectiveness over maximum performance.

Your workload requires consistent, reliable performance.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Ministral 3 14B vs Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning) Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/