Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Magistral Small 1.2: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Magistral Small 1.2 Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Magistral Small 1.2 emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Mistral Medium 3.1 remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Magistral Small 1.2 comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Mistral Medium 3.1

Mistral

Reasoning: 4
Coding: 2
Multimodal: 2
Long Context: 3
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.001
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 92.492tokens/sec

Magistral Small 1.2

Mistral

Reasoning: 8
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 2
Long Context: 3
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.001
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 193.218tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Magistral Small 1.2 matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Magistral Small 1.2 analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Mistral Medium 3.1` vs `Magistral Small 1.2`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Magistral Small 1.2 debate, Mistral Medium 3.1 scores 40 against Magistral Small 1.2's 80. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Magistral Small 1.2 comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Magistral Small 1.2 decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Mistral Medium 3.1300ms

Magistral Small 1.2300ms

Tokens per Second

Mistral Medium 3.192.492

Magistral Small 1.2193.218

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Magistral Small 1.2

Power is only one part of the equation. This Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Magistral Small 1.2 pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Mistral Medium 3.1 would cost $0.001, whereas Magistral Small 1.2 would cost $0.001. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Magistral Small 1.2 choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Magistral Small 1.2 Battle for You?

Choose Mistral Medium 3.1 if...

Cost is a secondary concern to power in your Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Magistral Small 1.2 decision.

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Your use case demands cutting-edge AI performance.

Choose Magistral Small 1.2 if...

You need a highly responsive model for user-facing applications.

Your budget is a primary consideration in the Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Magistral Small 1.2 choice.

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Magistral Small 1.2 Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/