Mistral Small (Feb '24) vs Jamba 1.5 Mini: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Mistral Small (Feb '24) vs Jamba 1.5 Mini Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Jamba 1.5 Mini emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Mistral Small (Feb '24) remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Mistral Small (Feb '24) vs Jamba 1.5 Mini comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Mistral Small (Feb '24)

Mistral

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 6
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 1
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.002
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 119.688tokens/sec

Jamba 1.5 Mini

Other

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 6
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 1
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.000
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: —

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Mistral Small (Feb '24) vs Jamba 1.5 Mini matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Mistral Small (Feb '24) vs Jamba 1.5 Mini analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Mistral Small (Feb '24)` vs `Jamba 1.5 Mini`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Mistral Small (Feb '24) vs Jamba 1.5 Mini debate, Mistral Small (Feb '24) scores 60 against Jamba 1.5 Mini's 60. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Mistral Small (Feb '24) vs Jamba 1.5 Mini comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Mistral Small (Feb '24) vs Jamba 1.5 Mini decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Mistral Small (Feb '24)300ms

Jamba 1.5 Mini300ms

Tokens per Second

Mistral Small (Feb '24)119.688

Jamba 1.5 Mini46

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Mistral Small (Feb '24) vs Jamba 1.5 Mini

Power is only one part of the equation. This Mistral Small (Feb '24) vs Jamba 1.5 Mini pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Mistral Small (Feb '24) would cost $0.002, whereas Jamba 1.5 Mini would cost $0.000. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Mistral Small (Feb '24) vs Jamba 1.5 Mini choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Mistral Small (Feb '24) vs Jamba 1.5 Mini Battle for You?

Choose Mistral Small (Feb '24) if...

Cost is a secondary concern to power in your Mistral Small (Feb '24) vs Jamba 1.5 Mini decision.

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Your use case demands cutting-edge AI performance.

Choose Jamba 1.5 Mini if...

You need a highly responsive model for user-facing applications.

Your budget is a primary consideration in the Mistral Small (Feb '24) vs Jamba 1.5 Mini choice.

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Mistral Small (Feb '24) vs Jamba 1.5 Mini Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/