o1 vs Qwen Chat 72B: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the o1 vs Qwen Chat 72B Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Qwen Chat 72B emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, o1 remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed o1 vs Qwen Chat 72B comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

OpenAI

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 2
Multimodal: 3
Long Context: 4
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.026
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 155.329tokens/sec

Qwen Chat 72B

Other

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 6
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 1
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.015
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: —

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the o1 vs Qwen Chat 72B matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our o1 vs Qwen Chat 72B analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `o1` vs `Qwen Chat 72B`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the o1 vs Qwen Chat 72B debate, o1 scores 60 against Qwen Chat 72B's 60. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious o1 vs Qwen Chat 72B comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the o1 vs Qwen Chat 72B decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

o1300ms

Qwen Chat 72B300ms

Tokens per Second

o1155.329

Qwen Chat 72B38

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of o1 vs Qwen Chat 72B

Power is only one part of the equation. This o1 vs Qwen Chat 72B pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, o1 would cost $0.030, whereas Qwen Chat 72B would cost $0.018. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the o1 vs Qwen Chat 72B choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the o1 vs Qwen Chat 72B Battle for You?

Choose o1 if...

Cost is a secondary concern to power in your o1 vs Qwen Chat 72B decision.

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Your use case demands cutting-edge AI performance.

Choose Qwen Chat 72B if...

You need a highly responsive model for user-facing applications.

Your budget is a primary consideration in the o1 vs Qwen Chat 72B choice.

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the o1 vs Qwen Chat 72B Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/