Phi-4 Mini Instruct vs Reka Flash 3: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Phi-4 Mini Instruct vs Reka Flash 3 Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Reka Flash 3 emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Phi-4 Mini Instruct remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Phi-4 Mini Instruct vs Reka Flash 3 comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Phi-4 Mini Instruct

Other

Reasoning: 1
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 1
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.015
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 44.419tokens/sec

Reka Flash 3

Other

Reasoning: 3
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 2
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.000
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 48.854tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Phi-4 Mini Instruct vs Reka Flash 3 matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Phi-4 Mini Instruct vs Reka Flash 3 analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Phi-4 Mini Instruct` vs `Reka Flash 3`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Phi-4 Mini Instruct vs Reka Flash 3 debate, Phi-4 Mini Instruct scores 10 against Reka Flash 3's 30. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Phi-4 Mini Instruct vs Reka Flash 3 comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Phi-4 Mini Instruct vs Reka Flash 3 decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Phi-4 Mini Instruct300ms

Reka Flash 3300ms

Tokens per Second

Phi-4 Mini Instruct44.419

Reka Flash 348.854

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Phi-4 Mini Instruct vs Reka Flash 3

Power is only one part of the equation. This Phi-4 Mini Instruct vs Reka Flash 3 pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Phi-4 Mini Instruct would cost $0.018, whereas Reka Flash 3 would cost $0.000. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Phi-4 Mini Instruct vs Reka Flash 3 choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Phi-4 Mini Instruct vs Reka Flash 3 Battle for You?

Choose Phi-4 Mini Instruct if...

Cost is a secondary concern to power in your Phi-4 Mini Instruct vs Reka Flash 3 decision.

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Your use case demands cutting-edge AI performance.

Choose Reka Flash 3 if...

You need a highly responsive model for user-facing applications.

Your budget is a primary consideration in the Phi-4 Mini Instruct vs Reka Flash 3 choice.

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Phi-4 Mini Instruct vs Reka Flash 3 Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/