Qwen3 4B 2507 (Reasoning) vs Mistral 7B Instruct: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Qwen3 4B 2507 (Reasoning) vs Mistral 7B Instruct Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Mistral 7B Instruct emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Qwen3 4B 2507 (Reasoning) remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Qwen3 4B 2507 (Reasoning) vs Mistral 7B Instruct comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Qwen3 4B 2507 (Reasoning)

Other

Reasoning: 8
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 2
Long Context: 2
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.015
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: —

Mistral 7B Instruct

Mistral

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 6
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 1
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.000
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 108.326tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Qwen3 4B 2507 (Reasoning) vs Mistral 7B Instruct matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Qwen3 4B 2507 (Reasoning) vs Mistral 7B Instruct analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Qwen3 4B 2507 (Reasoning)` vs `Mistral 7B Instruct`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Qwen3 4B 2507 (Reasoning) vs Mistral 7B Instruct debate, Qwen3 4B 2507 (Reasoning) scores 80 against Mistral 7B Instruct's 60. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Qwen3 4B 2507 (Reasoning) vs Mistral 7B Instruct comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Qwen3 4B 2507 (Reasoning) vs Mistral 7B Instruct decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Qwen3 4B 2507 (Reasoning)300ms

Mistral 7B Instruct300ms

Tokens per Second

Qwen3 4B 2507 (Reasoning)36

Mistral 7B Instruct108.326

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Qwen3 4B 2507 (Reasoning) vs Mistral 7B Instruct

Power is only one part of the equation. This Qwen3 4B 2507 (Reasoning) vs Mistral 7B Instruct pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Qwen3 4B 2507 (Reasoning) would cost $0.018, whereas Mistral 7B Instruct would cost $0.000. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Qwen3 4B 2507 (Reasoning) vs Mistral 7B Instruct choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Qwen3 4B 2507 (Reasoning) vs Mistral 7B Instruct Battle for You?

Choose Qwen3 4B 2507 (Reasoning) if...

Your top priority is raw performance and capability.

You are working in a technical or scientific field requiring the highest accuracy.

Cost is a secondary concern to power in your Qwen3 4B 2507 (Reasoning) vs Mistral 7B Instruct decision.

Choose Mistral 7B Instruct if...

You need a highly responsive model for user-facing applications.

Your budget is a primary consideration in the Qwen3 4B 2507 (Reasoning) vs Mistral 7B Instruct choice.

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Qwen3 4B 2507 (Reasoning) vs Mistral 7B Instruct Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/