Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) vs Mistral Large (Feb '24): The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) vs Mistral Large (Feb '24) Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Mistral Large (Feb '24) emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) vs Mistral Large (Feb '24) comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning)

Other

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 3
Multimodal: 3
Long Context: 5
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.001
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 125.566tokens/sec

Mistral Large (Feb '24)

Mistral

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 6
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 1
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.006
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: —

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) vs Mistral Large (Feb '24) matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) vs Mistral Large (Feb '24) analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning)` vs `Mistral Large (Feb '24)`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) vs Mistral Large (Feb '24) debate, Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) scores 60 against Mistral Large (Feb '24)'s 60. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) vs Mistral Large (Feb '24) comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) vs Mistral Large (Feb '24) decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning)300ms

Mistral Large (Feb '24)300ms

Tokens per Second

Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning)125.566

Mistral Large (Feb '24)61

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) vs Mistral Large (Feb '24)

Power is only one part of the equation. This Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) vs Mistral Large (Feb '24) pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) would cost $0.001, whereas Mistral Large (Feb '24) would cost $0.007. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) vs Mistral Large (Feb '24) choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) vs Mistral Large (Feb '24) Battle for You?

Choose Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) if...

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Your use case demands cutting-edge AI performance.

Choose Mistral Large (Feb '24) if...

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

You prioritize cost-effectiveness over maximum performance.

Your workload requires consistent, reliable performance.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) vs Mistral Large (Feb '24) Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts