Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct vs GPT-3.5 Turbo (0613): The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct vs GPT-3.5 Turbo (0613) Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, GPT-3.5 Turbo (0613) emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct vs GPT-3.5 Turbo (0613) comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct

Other

Reasoning: 4
Coding: 2
Multimodal: 2
Long Context: 3
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.003
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 44.213tokens/sec

GPT-3.5 Turbo (0613)

OpenAI

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 6
Multimodal: 5
Long Context: 8
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.015
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: —

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct vs GPT-3.5 Turbo (0613) matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct vs GPT-3.5 Turbo (0613) analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct` vs `GPT-3.5 Turbo (0613)`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct vs GPT-3.5 Turbo (0613) debate, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct scores 40 against GPT-3.5 Turbo (0613)'s 60. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct vs GPT-3.5 Turbo (0613) comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct vs GPT-3.5 Turbo (0613) decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct300ms

GPT-3.5 Turbo (0613)300ms

Tokens per Second

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct44.213

GPT-3.5 Turbo (0613)36

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct vs GPT-3.5 Turbo (0613)

Power is only one part of the equation. This Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct vs GPT-3.5 Turbo (0613) pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct would cost $0.003, whereas GPT-3.5 Turbo (0613) would cost $0.018. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct vs GPT-3.5 Turbo (0613) choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct vs GPT-3.5 Turbo (0613) Battle for You?

Choose Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct if...

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Your use case demands cutting-edge AI performance.

Choose GPT-3.5 Turbo (0613) if...

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

You prioritize cost-effectiveness over maximum performance.

Your workload requires consistent, reliable performance.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct vs GPT-3.5 Turbo (0613) Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/