Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct vs Command-R+ (Apr '24): The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct vs Command-R+ (Apr '24) Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Command-R+ (Apr '24) emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct vs Command-R+ (Apr '24) comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Other

Reasoning: 7
Coding: 2
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 2
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.001
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 69.414tokens/sec

Command-R+ (Apr '24)

Cohere

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 6
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 1
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.006
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: —

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct vs Command-R+ (Apr '24) matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct vs Command-R+ (Apr '24) analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct` vs `Command-R+ (Apr '24)`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct vs Command-R+ (Apr '24) debate, Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct scores 70 against Command-R+ (Apr '24)'s 60. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct vs Command-R+ (Apr '24) comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct vs Command-R+ (Apr '24) decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct300ms

Command-R+ (Apr '24)300ms

Tokens per Second

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct69.414

Command-R+ (Apr '24)64

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct vs Command-R+ (Apr '24)

Power is only one part of the equation. This Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct vs Command-R+ (Apr '24) pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct would cost $0.001, whereas Command-R+ (Apr '24) would cost $0.007. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct vs Command-R+ (Apr '24) choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct vs Command-R+ (Apr '24) Battle for You?

Choose Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct if...

You are working in a technical or scientific field requiring the highest accuracy.

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Your use case demands cutting-edge AI performance.

Choose Command-R+ (Apr '24) if...

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

You prioritize cost-effectiveness over maximum performance.

Your workload requires consistent, reliable performance.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct vs Command-R+ (Apr '24) Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/