Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct vs MiniMax-M2: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct vs MiniMax-M2 Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, MiniMax-M2 emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct vs MiniMax-M2 comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct

Other

Reasoning: 4
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 2
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.015
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: —

MiniMax-M2

Other

Reasoning: 8
Coding: 3
Multimodal: 3
Long Context: 5
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.001
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 95.136tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct vs MiniMax-M2 matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct vs MiniMax-M2 analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct` vs `MiniMax-M2`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct vs MiniMax-M2 debate, Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct scores 40 against MiniMax-M2's 80. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct vs MiniMax-M2 comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct vs MiniMax-M2 decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct300ms

MiniMax-M2300ms

Tokens per Second

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct31

MiniMax-M295.136

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct vs MiniMax-M2

Power is only one part of the equation. This Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct vs MiniMax-M2 pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct would cost $0.018, whereas MiniMax-M2 would cost $0.001. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct vs MiniMax-M2 choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct vs MiniMax-M2 Battle for You?

Choose Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct if...

Cost is a secondary concern to power in your Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct vs MiniMax-M2 decision.

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Your use case demands cutting-edge AI performance.

Choose MiniMax-M2 if...

You need a highly responsive model for user-facing applications.

Your budget is a primary consideration in the Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct vs MiniMax-M2 choice.

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct vs MiniMax-M2 Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/