Solar Mini vs Qwen3 32B (Reasoning): The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Solar Mini vs Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Solar Mini emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Solar Mini vs Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Solar Mini

Other

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 6
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 1
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.000
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 81.891tokens/sec

Qwen3 32B (Reasoning)

Other

Reasoning: 7
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 2
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.003
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 90.638tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Solar Mini vs Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Solar Mini vs Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Solar Mini` vs `Qwen3 32B (Reasoning)`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Solar Mini vs Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) debate, Solar Mini scores 60 against Qwen3 32B (Reasoning)'s 70. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Solar Mini vs Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Solar Mini vs Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Solar Mini300ms

Qwen3 32B (Reasoning)300ms

Tokens per Second

Solar Mini81.891

Qwen3 32B (Reasoning)90.638

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Solar Mini vs Qwen3 32B (Reasoning)

Power is only one part of the equation. This Solar Mini vs Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Solar Mini would cost $0.000, whereas Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) would cost $0.003. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Solar Mini vs Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy