Step3 VL 10B vs Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning): The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Step3 VL 10B vs Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Step3 VL 10B remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Step3 VL 10B vs Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Step3 VL 10B

Other

Reasoning: 6
Coding: 1
Multimodal: 1
Long Context: 2
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.015
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: —

Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning)

Other

Reasoning: 7
Coding: 2
Multimodal: 5
Long Context: 8
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.001
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 73.343tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Step3 VL 10B vs Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Step3 VL 10B vs Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Step3 VL 10B` vs `Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning)`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Step3 VL 10B vs Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) debate, Step3 VL 10B scores 60 against Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning)'s 70. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Step3 VL 10B vs Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Step3 VL 10B vs Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Step3 VL 10B300ms

Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning)300ms

Tokens per Second

Step3 VL 10B29

Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning)73.343

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Step3 VL 10B vs Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning)

Power is only one part of the equation. This Step3 VL 10B vs Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Step3 VL 10B would cost $0.018, whereas Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) would cost $0.002. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Step3 VL 10B vs Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Step3 VL 10B vs Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) Battle for You?

Choose Step3 VL 10B if...

Cost is a secondary concern to power in your Step3 VL 10B vs Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) decision.

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Your use case demands cutting-edge AI performance.

Choose Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) if...

You need a highly responsive model for user-facing applications.

Your budget is a primary consideration in the Step3 VL 10B vs Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) choice.

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Step3 VL 10B vs Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/