Skip to content

JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B vs o3: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B vs o3 Showdown

The current catalog does not contain complete performance evidence for both models, so this page does not declare an overall winner. Use the available fields as comparison signals and validate the models on your own workload.

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21Bo3
6.0
Reasoning
9.0
5.0
Coding
6.0
3.0
Multimodal
3.0
5.0
Long Context
4.0
$15
Blended Price / 1M tokens
$3.5
P95 Latency
Tokens per second
128.056

Machine-readable comparison data

ModelMetricValueUnitSource / snapshot
JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21BReasoning6.0benchmark or capability scoreArtificial Analysis · current catalog
o3Reasoning9.0benchmark or capability scoreArtificial Analysis · current catalog
JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21BCoding5.0benchmark or capability scoreArtificial Analysis · current catalog
o3Coding6.0benchmark or capability scoreArtificial Analysis · current catalog
JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21BMultimodal3.0benchmark or capability scoreArtificial Analysis · current catalog
o3Multimodal3.0benchmark or capability scoreArtificial Analysis · current catalog
JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21BLong Context5.0benchmark or capability scoreArtificial Analysis · current catalog
o3Long Context4.0benchmark or capability scoreArtificial Analysis · current catalog
JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21BBlended Price / 1M tokens$15USD per 1M tokensArtificial Analysis · current catalog
o3Blended Price / 1M tokens$3.5USD per 1M tokensArtificial Analysis · current catalog
JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21BP95 LatencymillisecondsArtificial Analysis · current catalog
o3P95 LatencymillisecondsArtificial Analysis · current catalog
JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21BTokens per secondtokens per secondArtificial Analysis · current catalog
o3Tokens per second128.056tokens per secondArtificial Analysis · current catalog

Data provided by Artificial Analysis; live values use the current catalog.

Overall Capabilities

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B` vs `o3`.

IntelligenceCodingMathMultimodalLong Context
JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21Bo3

Benchmark Breakdown

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21Bo3

Speed & Latency

Lower time to first token is better; higher tokens per second is better.

Time to First Token · JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B
Time to First Token · o3
Tokens per Second · JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B
Tokens per Second · o3
128.056
Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B vs o3

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing in USD per 1M tokens.

JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21Bo3

Real-World Cost Scenario

Per run: 1M input tokens + 250k output tokens

JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B$17.5

o3$4

o3 costs $13.5 less per run

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Your Questions about the JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B vs o3 Comparison

Is `JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B` a direct replacement for `o3`?

The current JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B vs o3 data does not establish a universal replacement. Compare the available metrics, then validate quality, latency, reliability, and cost on your own workload.

For coding, which is better in the `JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B vs o3` debate?

The current catalog does not contain comparable coding benchmark values for both models, so this page does not declare a coding winner.

How was this `JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B vs o3` comparison conducted?

Our JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B vs o3 comparison uses published benchmark, pricing, speed, and latency fields provided by Artificial Analysis. Missing values remain unavailable, and the result should be checked against your workload.