Skip to content

Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal) vs o3: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal) vs o3 Showdown

The current catalog does not contain complete performance evidence for both models, so this page does not declare an overall winner. Use the available fields as comparison signals and validate the models on your own workload.

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal)o3
6.0
Reasoning
9.0
6.0
Coding
6.0
3.0
Multimodal
3.0
4.0
Long Context
4.0
$3.375
Blended Price / 1M tokens
$3.5
P95 Latency
248.998
Tokens per second
128.056

Machine-readable comparison data

ModelMetricValueUnitSource / snapshot
Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal)Reasoning6.0benchmark or capability scoreArtificial Analysis · current catalog
o3Reasoning9.0benchmark or capability scoreArtificial Analysis · current catalog
Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal)Coding6.0benchmark or capability scoreArtificial Analysis · current catalog
o3Coding6.0benchmark or capability scoreArtificial Analysis · current catalog
Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal)Multimodal3.0benchmark or capability scoreArtificial Analysis · current catalog
o3Multimodal3.0benchmark or capability scoreArtificial Analysis · current catalog
Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal)Long Context4.0benchmark or capability scoreArtificial Analysis · current catalog
o3Long Context4.0benchmark or capability scoreArtificial Analysis · current catalog
Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal)Blended Price / 1M tokens$3.375USD per 1M tokensArtificial Analysis · current catalog
o3Blended Price / 1M tokens$3.5USD per 1M tokensArtificial Analysis · current catalog
Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal)P95 LatencymillisecondsArtificial Analysis · current catalog
o3P95 LatencymillisecondsArtificial Analysis · current catalog
Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal)Tokens per second248.998tokens per secondArtificial Analysis · current catalog
o3Tokens per second128.056tokens per secondArtificial Analysis · current catalog

Data provided by Artificial Analysis; live values use the current catalog.

Overall Capabilities

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal)` vs `o3`.

IntelligenceCodingMathMultimodalLong Context
Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal)o3

Benchmark Breakdown

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal)o3

Speed & Latency

Lower time to first token is better; higher tokens per second is better.

Time to First Token · Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal)
Time to First Token · o3
Tokens per Second · Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal)
248.998
Tokens per Second · o3
128.056
Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal) vs o3

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing in USD per 1M tokens.

Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal)o3

Real-World Cost Scenario

Per run: 1M input tokens + 250k output tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal)$3.75

o3$4

Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal) costs $0.25 less per run

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Your Questions about the Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal) vs o3 Comparison

Is `Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal)` a direct replacement for `o3`?

The current Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal) vs o3 data does not establish a universal replacement. Compare the available metrics, then validate quality, latency, reliability, and cost on your own workload.

For coding, which is better in the `Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal) vs o3` debate?

The current catalog does not contain comparable coding benchmark values for both models, so this page does not declare a coding winner.

How was this `Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal) vs o3` comparison conducted?

Our Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal) vs o3 comparison uses published benchmark, pricing, speed, and latency fields provided by Artificial Analysis. Missing values remain unavailable, and the result should be checked against your workload.