Comparação de Modelos de IAComparação de Modelos de IA

Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs GLM-4.5 (Reasoning): A Comparação Definitiva de Desempenho e Preço

Mergulhe profundamente em raciocínio, benchmarks e insights de latência.

Explore os melhores cenáriosDeixe o AI Selector recomendar os próximos passos

Instantâneo do Modelo

Principais métricas de decisão em um relance.

Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning)
Anthropic
Raciocínio
9
Codificação
5
Multimodal
4
Contexto Longo
6
Preço Combinado / 1M tokens
$0.010
Latência P95
1000ms
Tokens por segundo
79.024tokens/seg
GLM-4.5 (Reasoning)
Other
Raciocínio
7
Codificação
3
Multimodal
2
Contexto Longo
3
Preço Combinado / 1M tokens
$0.001
Latência P95
1000ms
Tokens por segundo
46.531tokens/seg

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs GLM-4.5 (Reasoning) matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs GLM-4.5 (Reasoning) analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning)` vs `GLM-4.5 (Reasoning)`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs GLM-4.5 (Reasoning) debate, Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) scores 90 against GLM-4.5 (Reasoning)'s 70. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs GLM-4.5 (Reasoning) comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs GLM-4.5 (Reasoning) decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token
Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning)300ms
GLM-4.5 (Reasoning)300ms
Tokens per Second
Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning)79.024
GLM-4.5 (Reasoning)46.531
Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs GLM-4.5 (Reasoning)

Power is only one part of the equation. This Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs GLM-4.5 (Reasoning) pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown
Compare input and output pricing at a glance.
Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs GLM-4.5 (Reasoning) Battle for You?

Choose Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) if...
Your top priority is raw performance and capability.
You are working in a technical or scientific field requiring the highest accuracy.
Cost is a secondary concern to power in your Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs GLM-4.5 (Reasoning) decision.
Choose GLM-4.5 (Reasoning) if...
You need a highly responsive model for user-facing applications.
Your budget is a primary consideration in the Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs GLM-4.5 (Reasoning) choice.
You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.
Explore all Best picksUse the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs GLM-4.5 (Reasoning) Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodologyRead the latest analysis posts

Fonte de dados: https://artificialanalysis.ai/

Comparação de Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs GLM-4.5 (Reasoning) | Desempenho, Preços e Benchmarks