Comparação de Modelos de IAComparação de Modelos de IA

Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning): A Comparação Definitiva de Desempenho e Preço

Mergulhe profundamente em raciocínio, benchmarks e insights de latência.

Explore os melhores cenáriosDeixe o AI Selector recomendar os próximos passos

Instantâneo do Modelo

Principais métricas de decisão em um relance.

Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning)
Other
Raciocínio
7
Codificação
2
Multimodal
5
Contexto Longo
8
Preço Combinado / 1M tokens
$0.001
Latência P95
1000ms
Tokens por segundo
73.701tokens/seg
Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning)
Other
Raciocínio
2
Codificação
1
Multimodal
1
Contexto Longo
1
Preço Combinado / 1M tokens
$0.000
Latência P95
1000ms
Tokens por segundo
203.454tokens/seg

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning)` vs `Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning)`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) debate, Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) scores 70 against Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning)'s 20. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token
Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning)300ms
Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning)300ms
Tokens per Second
Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning)73.701
Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning)203.454
Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning)

Power is only one part of the equation. This Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown
Compare input and output pricing at a glance.
Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) Battle for You?

Choose Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) if...
You are working in a technical or scientific field requiring the highest accuracy.
You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.
Your use case demands cutting-edge AI performance.
Choose Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) if...
You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.
You prioritize cost-effectiveness over maximum performance.
Your workload requires consistent, reliable performance.
Explore all Best picksUse the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodologyRead the latest analysis posts

Fonte de dados: https://artificialanalysis.ai/

Comparação de Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) | Desempenho, Preços e Benchmarks