Comparação de Modelos de IAComparação de Modelos de IA

DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) vs Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning): A Comparação Definitiva de Desempenho e Preço

Mergulhe profundamente em raciocínio, benchmarks e insights de latência.

Explore os melhores cenáriosDeixe o AI Selector recomendar os próximos passos

Instantâneo do Modelo

Principais métricas de decisão em um relance.

DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25)
DeepSeek
Raciocínio
8
Codificação
2
Multimodal
2
Contexto Longo
3
Preço Combinado / 1M tokens
$0.002
Latência P95
1000ms
Tokens por segundo
—
Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning)
Other
Raciocínio
2
Codificação
1
Multimodal
1
Contexto Longo
1
Preço Combinado / 1M tokens
$0.000
Latência P95
1000ms
Tokens por segundo
203.454tokens/seg

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) vs Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) vs Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25)` vs `Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning)`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) vs Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) debate, DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) scores 80 against Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning)'s 20. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) vs Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) vs Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token
DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25)300ms
Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning)300ms
Tokens per Second
DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25)25
Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning)203.454
Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) vs Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning)

Power is only one part of the equation. This DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) vs Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown
Compare input and output pricing at a glance.
Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) vs Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) Battle for You?

Choose DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) if...
Your top priority is raw performance and capability.
You are working in a technical or scientific field requiring the highest accuracy.
Cost is a secondary concern to power in your DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) vs Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) decision.
Choose Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) if...
You need a highly responsive model for user-facing applications.
Your budget is a primary consideration in the DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) vs Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) choice.
You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.
Explore all Best picksUse the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) vs Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodologyRead the latest analysis posts

Fonte de dados: https://artificialanalysis.ai/

Comparação de DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) vs Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) | Desempenho, Preços e Benchmarks