Comparação de Modelos de IAComparação de Modelos de IA

Gemma 3n E2B Instruct vs Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning): A Comparação Definitiva de Desempenho e Preço

Mergulhe profundamente em raciocínio, benchmarks e insights de latência.

Explore os melhores cenáriosDeixe o AI Selector recomendar os próximos passos

Instantâneo do Modelo

Principais métricas de decisão em um relance.

Gemma 3n E2B Instruct
Google
Raciocínio
1
Codificação
1
Multimodal
1
Contexto Longo
1
Preço Combinado / 1M tokens
$0.015
Latência P95
1000ms
Tokens por segundo
34.764tokens/seg
Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning)
Other
Raciocínio
2
Codificação
1
Multimodal
1
Contexto Longo
1
Preço Combinado / 1M tokens
$0.000
Latência P95
1000ms
Tokens por segundo
203.454tokens/seg

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Gemma 3n E2B Instruct vs Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Gemma 3n E2B Instruct vs Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Gemma 3n E2B Instruct` vs `Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning)`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Gemma 3n E2B Instruct vs Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) debate, Gemma 3n E2B Instruct scores 10 against Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning)'s 20. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Gemma 3n E2B Instruct vs Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Gemma 3n E2B Instruct vs Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token
Gemma 3n E2B Instruct300ms
Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning)300ms
Tokens per Second
Gemma 3n E2B Instruct34.764
Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning)203.454
Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Gemma 3n E2B Instruct vs Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning)

Power is only one part of the equation. This Gemma 3n E2B Instruct vs Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown
Compare input and output pricing at a glance.
Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Gemma 3n E2B Instruct vs Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) Battle for You?

Choose Gemma 3n E2B Instruct if...
Cost is a secondary concern to power in your Gemma 3n E2B Instruct vs Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) decision.
You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.
Your use case demands cutting-edge AI performance.
Choose Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) if...
You need a highly responsive model for user-facing applications.
Your budget is a primary consideration in the Gemma 3n E2B Instruct vs Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) choice.
You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.
Explore all Best picksUse the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Gemma 3n E2B Instruct vs Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodologyRead the latest analysis posts

Fonte de dados: https://artificialanalysis.ai/

Comparação de Gemma 3n E2B Instruct vs Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) | Desempenho, Preços e Benchmarks